Like any other art form, music must contend with advancements in technology. And like any other artists, musicians must decide what to embrace and what to reject. In the case of electronic music, battle lines were quickly drawn between "legitimate" musicians and those willing to forge into new territories. In the 70s and 80s, the objects of scorn were often Disco (e.g. Donna Summer, Giorgio Moroder) and Synth Pop (e.g. Tom Tom Club, Depeche Mode, New Order). Though often acclaimed today, these records were routinely derided for their reliance on computers, drum machines, and synthesizers. In the early 21st century, the debate continues. This time, it is primarily over EDM (Electronic Dance Music). In an era where DJs command as much attention as singers and musicians, many rebuff EDM as electronic noises trying to pass off as music. Whether its Acid House, New Wave, Electronica, Dance Music, Industrial (NSFW), Trance, House Music, or Techno, will electronic music ever achieve full critical acceptance? Must music involve an instrument and a player to be legitimately considered music? Finally, who gets to decide what is and isn't music?
Include at least two of the following in your discussion:
- "Is Electronic Music "Real Music'?" (Seeker)
- "Dave Grohl: His Grammys Speech about Electronic Music was Bullshit" (LA Weekly)
- "Stop Confusing EDM with All Electronic Music, Already" (Vice)
- "Is EDM a Real Genre?" (Noisey)
- "What to Tell Anyone Who Thinks EDM isn't Real Music" (Mic)
- "Are DJs musicians? They certainly need talent ..." (Sound On Sound)
Mechanics:
- 1-1.5 pages in length
- MLA Style
- Include works cited page
Due: Wed 9.5
No comments:
Post a Comment